Author: Carl Bainbridge
I am finding that I am getting increasingly disturbed by the way things have progressed over the last few days, surrounding the dispute between the City and Codiac Transpo.
I am concerned to start with over the wording used when the City originally decided to lock out Codiac Transpo without notice. The wording was along the lines of indicating that there was no notice given because of essentially safety and security concerns. While this is standard operating procedure in disputes, especially those where there is high levels of animosity and high likelihood of damage, the choice of wording gives the impression that the City did not feel that the ATU as a whole would operate in a respectable manner. It is not impossible that there are one or two amongst those laid off who could have harbored sufficiently ill feelings for this to be the case, however it is unlikely that any form of widespread violence or vandalism would have occurred. Most specifically while it is normal for employers to lock out employees with no notice, it is usually handled with far better tact then was shown with the statements by the city’s spokesperson. It would have been far better to have simply indicated that insurance and/or lawyers insisted on it for safety reason’s even though all parties understood that adverse events were unlikely. In this matter in all honesty the City and it’s spokesperson realistically owe the union an apology for the way it was handled.
Another thing that concerns me greatly is again an issue that is common, and totally legal, however is also extremely unfair and completely unethical.
This regards the removal of benefits from those who have been laid off. There are some amongst the staff or amongst the covered family members who are extremely ill and who require medications covered by these benefits. This type of action can cause extreme suffering, especially as those with preexisting conditions often can not get coverage, so a new job with benefits (that often do not kick in for between 3 months to a year) will not cut it. There is also the issue regarding the fact that if this coverage is terminated will those who are already ill, or who become ill while the lockout is ongoing, still be eligible to be covered once the contract dispute is resolved. While I have no final figures on how many are going to be immediately affected and how many will be affected over the long-term if the dispute runs for an extended period, what I can say is that to have any individual subjected to this type of issue simply due to a contract dispute is disgusting in the max and is almost guaranteed to damage the city’s credibility unless it is corrected quickly.
It should also be noted that to most people, even during a dispute, very few people would think to expect an interruption of employee benefits. The fact that the city chose to do so, even if it is 100% legal is extremely disturbing and shows the extreme tactics they are choosing to use in an attempt to break the union’s resolve.
Author: Carl Bainbridge
There are differing positions on the Codiac Transpo lockout and that is to be expected however from an outsider’s perspective I seriously believe that the City of Moncton blew it with this decision. There are numerous reasons why I believe this and I will try to explain some of them here.
- Public opinion: While public opinion on many parts of this has supported the city up till this point, in general public opinion generally goes against the group who pulls the trigger on a strike/lockout in any action.
- Bargaining Position: The stronger bargaining position always goes to the person who has the least to lose. By pulling the trigger on a lockout the city has instantly ceded the stronger bargaining position to the ATU
- Money Pressure: When a union goes on strike, the union gives strike pay to its workers, this is usually a small amount and by no means sufficient to meet day-to-day expenses. When the union is locked out, workers are eligible for unemployment which will pay sufficiently more than strike pay. This reduces the urgency on the union to accept a reduction.
- Long Term Staffing Concerns: This is a big issue and due to recent changes to EI could actually effect the strike even more severely. As the strike in Halifax and the regional bus strike has shown as job action drags on people look for other jobs. This means the city could be faced with a rush to hire new staff after the lockout ends. Changes to EI forcing people to accept lower paying jobs based on length of time unemployed could actually increase staff attrition. This will likely long-term affect the city more than the Union as the staff that lasts the longest will be the strongest of the union members.
- Labour Board Case: The issue surrounding the “original deal” is to be heard by the labour board in July. By not waiting till after the labour board case to do a lock out suggests the city is trying to put pressure on the union and also suggests that perhaps there is a belief amongst the city that they may not win at the labour board. This actually gives this advantage to the Union again.
- Timing: This has a couple of aspects :
1/ Election. This action being done so soon AFTER an election. Over time people will question why this was not done before the election and give people and opportunity to voice their opinion on it. It may not have changed the overall results but it would have affected vote counts without a doubt.
2/ Overnight on a weeknight: Instead of doing this after the last bus on a Saturday night to allow the vast majority of bus passengers 24 hours. This was done in a method that did not allow everyone sufficient time to make alternate plans. It is highly likely as well that many people would have gone to the bus stop this AM without even being aware that there was a work stoppage. Both of these aspects will also damage the city’s position long term.
No matter how I look at this to me long-term the city has now seriously screwed up and has put themselves in a seriously reduced bargaining position. This is in my mind a huge mistake on the part of the city and one that will likely come back to bite them in the long-term.
The only thing at this point that could swing any advantage to the city is if the labour board ruled in favour of the city and in my mind that is unlikely at this point and my suspicion is that the city is well aware of that.
My view on how this plays out is that short term the bus drivers will be the target but as time passes I seriously suspect that this will reverse and the city will be the one to bear the brunt of the anger of those who rely on transit.
Author: Carl Bainbridge
For years we have heard that it is done this way. We have to do it this way. This is the way it has always been done.
I am here to say perhaps it is time to stop doing things the same way time after time. Perhaps it is time to find a new way of thinking. Perhaps if systems that are presently in place do not work for the best interests of Moncton or the people who live there, then just maybe it is time to start looking at different ways of doing things.
It is time to start thinking outside the box. We have for years been doing the same thing over and over again and maybe getting a little bit ahead now, losing some later and basically treading water keeping our heads above the water line. Maybe it is time to swim for shore. Maybe it is time to put our feet down and realize that we get farther out of the water if we just stand up in the pool.
Basically what I am saying is that we have always done things a certain specific way, because that is protocol or that is all the municipalities act works. I am here to say that any obstacle that stops us from reaching our peak performance is an obstacle that needs to be removed. If the people that are putting the block in our way do not want to move it for us then we will either have to find a way to go around it, or we will go right through it. It is not in the best interests of the people in this city to let obstacles mar our ability to do our job.
So today I am saying that it is time we stepped outside the box and started to find ways to do things ourselves without waiting for permission or for someone else to do them for us. The reason that it is time is because if we do not learn to stand on our own two feet, then no one will ever believe we have the ability to manage our affairs without their personal, direct oversight and with their direct permission (for which they will make us beg)
It is time, if the province will not modernize the municipalities act then we will have to find ways to do it without them, whether they like it or not, because we as a city are strong enough to stand on our own .
If we really can as they say “punch above our weight class” then let us really punch above our weight class and actually do something productive with that ability.
Author: Carl Bainbridge
One thing I have noticed with discussions ongoing over the last few weeks regarding the Codiac Transpo dispute has been the differing sides to the discussion and how people are reacting based on what they think is the situation.
I think the time has come to start putting a full disclosure policy in place. For union negotiations this means that at all stages of the negotiation process a full disclosure of the exact details of each sides position, including full costing of this, as well as the full complete details of each offer along with a fully detailed costing of each item including a fully detailed costing of the existing deal, broken down as a cost per employee basis.
The full details of this policy needs to be more fully defined but in all honesty my dealings with people over the last few weeks when discussing the transit dispute and the varying different opinions of exactly what each offer includes and what each means has shown me that the present requirement that these negotiations should be held in secret must be ended and quickly.
To have a discussion of this magnitude and with this many different positions tells me that the time for openness and transparency of all government business has long since passed the point of necessity and entered into an urgent need.
The time for secrecy and behind closed door dealings has gone out with the Dodo Bird and now needs to be put out of it’s misery. There is no longer any purpose for secrecy and any attempt to hide behind closed doors for anything but personal lives or purchase negotiations (while the negotiations are ongoing) or highly sensitive staffing issues (until they have been resolved) should be done publicly and all but personal lives should be made public as soon as negotiations are completed or issues are put to rest.